There is a moment in a growing firm when intake stops being something people do and becomes something the firm operates: dedicated staff, several lead sources, a manager with a conversion target. The tooling question changes at that moment, because intake software built around automating one person's follow-up starts creaking under a department.

Intake platforms are the answer to that scale. This comparison covers the three names that dominate the shortlist: Lead Docket, Captorra, and Litify.

A sizing note first: these platforms were proven in high-volume consumer practices, personal injury above all. A 5-10 attorney immigration firm buying leads at volume has the same operational shape (many inquiries, phone-first contact, conversion economics per source), which is why the category transfers. But the implementation cost is real, and firms below a few hundred inquiries a month should read the tier-below comparison instead.

Disclosure: Immileads sells immigration leads, not software, and has no commercial relationship with any vendor here.

What defines the platform tier

Three capabilities separate platforms from intake software:

  1. Attribution as an accounting system. Not just "where did this lead come from" but spend, cost per lead, cost per signed case, and revenue per source, reported well enough to run budget decisions on.
  2. Department mechanics. Round-robin and skill-based routing, shift coverage, per-agent scoreboards, SLA timers, and escalations when a lead sits untouched.
  3. Referral economics. Inbound and outbound referral tracking with fee management, which becomes real money at volume.

If none of those made you nod, you do not need this tier yet. That is a compliment to your simplicity, not a gap.

The three platforms

Lead Docket: intake operations, productized

Lead Docket, part of the Filevine family, is the most explicitly intake-shaped of the three: lead tracking through conversion, automated messaging and task cadences, custom intake forms and scripts, marketing attribution down to cost and revenue per source, referral fee tracking, and AI-assisted tooling around summaries and intake timelines.

It connects naturally to Filevine but is used in front of other case management systems too, and its integration surface covers call tracking, web forms, and answering services. For a firm whose project is "build a measurable intake department," it is the most direct fit on this page.

Captorra: the signup specialist

Captorra has been in legal intake longer than most of the category has existed, with its center of gravity in case signup conversion: intake scripting, lead-to-signup process control, and real-time analytics positioned as business intelligence for intake.

Its public materials say less about adjacent features (payments, referral economics, AI tooling) than Lead Docket's, so the evaluation should happen in a demo against your own intake flow rather than on feature pages. Its longevity in high-volume practices is the credential; make the demo prove the fit for yours.

Litify: intake inside the Salesforce platform

Litify is not an intake tool; it is a legal operating platform built on Salesforce, with intake as one module beside matters, documents, and reporting. Choosing it for intake alone is buying a building for one room.

The case for it: a firm already on (or heading to) Salesforce, wanting intake, matter management, and firm-wide analytics in one data model, with Salesforce-grade automation underneath. The case against is the same sentence read as cost: admin overhead, implementation as a months-long project, and pricing to match. We covered where that trade makes sense in the CRM comparison.

Side by side

Lead DocketCaptorraLitify
ShapeIntake operations productSignup conversion specialistLegal platform (Salesforce)
Routing & SLAsStrongStrongStrong (configurable)
Marketing attributionCore, to revenue per sourceAnalytics-ledSalesforce-grade
Referral fee trackingYesDemo questionConfigurable
AI intake toolingPublicizedDemo questionPlatform-level
Case management tieFilevine family, others via APIIntegrates with CM systemsNative (same platform)
PricingQuoteQuoteQuote (Salesforce economics)
ImplementationWeeksWeeksMonths

The measurement dividend

The under-sold benefit of this tier is what it does to lead buying. Once every source is tracked to cost per signed case, vendor conversations change character: renewals become arithmetic, underperforming sources lose budget without drama, and the lead quality metrics that settle vendor arguments come out of a dashboard instead of a spreadsheet project.

That transparency is the environment we prefer to be measured in. Immileads leads arrive by API within 60 seconds of form submission, carrying visa-type screening data, into any CRM or intake platform that accepts a posting spec, which all three here do. Route them by case type, put the first call inside the five-minute window, and read the per-source report a batch later.

If the report is the part you already have and the pipeline is what needs filling, get started with a 30-100 lead test batch.

FAQ

When does a law firm need a dedicated intake platform?

When intake becomes a department rather than a task: multiple people working leads full-time, several lead sources needing per-source cost and conversion attribution, and partners managing intake by dashboard rather than by asking around. In practice that threshold arrives somewhere past a few hundred inquiries a month. Below it, intake software like Lawmatics or Law Ruler covers the need at a fraction of the implementation cost.

What is the difference between Lead Docket, Captorra, and Litify?

Lead Docket, part of the Filevine family, is the most intake-operations-shaped: routing, automated follow-up, marketing attribution, referral tracking, and AI-assisted intake tooling. Captorra is a longtime intake specialist with its center of gravity in signup conversion and real-time analytics. Litify is a full legal platform on Salesforce where intake is one module, which makes sense when the firm wants Salesforce-grade reporting across the whole business, not just intake.

Do intake platforms handle purchased leads well?

They are built for exactly that. All three accept leads by API or posting spec, which means a purchased lead can arrive with its screening data, be routed by case type in seconds, and be tracked per vendor through to signed case. That last part quietly settles vendor arguments: per-source cost-per-case reporting shows which lead company earns its invoice. Immileads delivers into any CRM or intake platform with an API within 60 seconds.

Ready to grow your immigration practice?

Qualified, exclusive immigration leads: fixed price per lead, no retainers, no long-term contracts. Start with a 30-100 lead test batch.

GET STARTED NOW